Providing Out-of-Band Connectivity to Mission-Critical IT Resources

SD-WAN ROI Calculator & Cost Reduction Strategies

sd-wan roi calculator

As an organization expands by adding new branches, its WAN also expands. The larger the WAN grows, the more network traffic needs to flow through MPLS (multi-protocol label switching) circuits, which have much more expensive bandwidth fees than traditional circuits. Some organizations improve their network performance by deploying security appliances at regional data centers, so they don’t need to backhaul traffic through the central firewall, but this only increases MPLS expenses and operating costs. Plus, spinning up each branch takes time, partly because of how long it takes to install a new MPLS circuit, which reduces agility and increases overhead costs.

SD-WAN, or software-defined wide area networking, abstracts WAN management to a separate control plane, streamlining workflows and allowing for a high degree of automation. SD-WAN makes it possible to leverage 5G and other networking technologies to reduce the reliance on MPLS circuits while still applying security policies and controls. With SD-WAN, you can lower your MPLS bandwidth costs, reduce the number of security appliances deployed around the enterprise, and deploy new branches faster.

In this post, we describe how SD-WAN decreases branch networking costs. We also explore strategies to reduce your expenses, providing an SD-WAN ROI calculator for a more personalized estimate of your potential savings.

How SD-WAN reduces branch networking costs

 

Reducing branch networking costs with SD-WAN

SD-WAN decreases MPLS bandwidth expenses by leveraging 5G and other available networks when possible.
An SD-WAN on-ramp to SASE means fewer security appliances deployed around the enterprise.
SD-WAN results in faster branch deployments by decreasing the reliance on new MPLS circuit installations.

 

Implementing SD-WAN can result in the following cost reduction benefits.

Decreased MPLS bandwidth expenses

In a traditional WAN architecture, MPLS circuits are installed at each branch to create a semi-private connection back to the primary enterprise network; this traffic isn’t encrypted, but it is partitioned from the public internet and other MPLS customers. MPLS networks are very reliable, but the bandwidth is significantly more expensive than public internet bandwidth. Finding ways to reduce the amount of traffic over MPLS circuits can reduce the ongoing operational costs of each branch.

SD-WAN leverages whatever networks are at its disposal—including MPLS, public ISPs, and 5G/4G cellular—to find the best and most efficient path for branch traffic. An organization can use SD-WAN software to prioritize specific kinds of traffic based on parameters such as the apps or resources being requested, so precious MPLS bandwidth is only used when needed. Many organizations are able to move away from MPLS completely by using SD-WAN. Providers are also required to build their SD-WAN fabric from encrypted tunnels, allowing SD-WAN to direct traffic over the public internet with less risk.

Cost reduction strategy: secure access service edge (SASE)

Even with SD-WAN’s encryption, branch traffic still needs to pass through a security appliance in the central data center so enterprise security policies and controls can be applied, which likely means using the MPLS anyway. Secure access service edge, or SASE, rolls up multiple enterprise security technologies (such as next-generation firewalls (NGFWs) and data loss prevention) into a single solution delivered as a service, which means organizations can deploy it to regional data centers or even the branches themselves. SD-WAN’s intelligent routing feature can determine when branch traffic is destined for cloud or web resources, then direct this traffic through the SASE stack instead of using the MPLS to reach the central firewall. SASE can help eliminate MPLS usage completely while reducing bottlenecks for greater cost savings.

With SD-WAN and SASE, your organization can reduce the ongoing monthly expense of MPLS bandwidth at each branch without sacrificing reliability or security.

 

Fewer security appliances

To ensure that branch traffic is as secure as the primary enterprise network, teams usually backhaul that traffic through the same central firewall for inspection and policy application. This creates a massive bottleneck that can slow the entire enterprise down, so some organizations choose to deploy security appliances at smaller regional data centers near their branch locations to distribute the load. However, that usually means additional MPLS circuits are provisioned at each data center, increasing startup and bandwidth costs. Plus, there are the hardware, software, and licensing costs for all the additional security appliances.

We’ve already mentioned how SD-WAN leverages alternative networks (as well as encrypted tunnels) to reduce MPLS bandwidth usage and how SASE applies enterprise security controls to branch traffic while bypassing firewalls entirely. These two benefits also result in cost savings from needing to purchase and license fewer security appliances. Since vendors deliver SASE as a service, it doesn’t necessarily require special hardware to run, and some providers even offer it as a managed cloud service, eliminating the hardware cost altogether.

Cost reduction strategy: vendor-neutral solutions

On-premises versions of SASE usually don’t need vendor-specific hardware so you can deploy the software on any available server as a VM. However, many branches lack the extra server storage or computer headroom needed for this kind of deployment. To ensure you can deploy SASE without buying additional resources, consider vendor-neutral branch networking solutions that can directly host and run third-party VMs. That means you can get gateway routing, switching, out-of-band serial console management, and SASE in a single device, consolidating the branch networking stack to reduce hardware expenses and management complexity.

With SD-WAN, SASE, and vendor-neutral solutions, you can streamline your branch deployments to reduce costs and increase efficiency.

 

Faster branch deployments

Generally speaking, the faster a company can deploy a new branch, the faster it will see a return on investment (ROI). However, getting a new MPLS circuit provisioned can take a long time—several months is typical—which can delay deployment timelines and increase overhead expenses while an organization sits on a non-productive branch.

SD-WAN makes it possible to leverage alternative network technologies to get a branch up and running before the MPLS circuit is ready. For example, SD-WAN can direct branch traffic across a 5G network even before the main fiber or cable connection is installed. When all of the branch circuits are provisioned, SD-WAN can seamlessly incorporate them into its routing policies based on preconfigured policies and automation triggers for a smooth deployment. In short, SD-WAN eliminates the organization’s reliance on MPLS for revenue generation, with branches that can be fully operational as soon as LTE or ISP links are set up.

Cost reduction strategy: zero touch provisioning (ZTP)

Another way to reduce branch spin-up times is with zero touch provisioning, or ZTP. ZTP uses software scripts to execute new device configurations over the network, reducing the need for pre-staging or manual, on-site programming. Typical branch deployments involve sending engineers on-site to manually copy and paste configuration files, which is time consuming and increases the risk of human error. With ZTP, unskilled on-site staff simply plug in new device cables and the configuration scripts are automatically retrieved and executed to fully build the environment without human touch. Plus, ZTP scripts are reusable, so you can use the same ones to deploy many different branches.

With SD-WAN and ZTP, your organization can reduce branch deployment delays and see a faster ROI from new branches.

 

SD-WAN ROI calculator

ZPE Systems provides vendor-neutral branch networking solutions that can directly host or integrate your choice of SD-WAN and SASE applications. ZPE’s platform also allows you to extend ZTP and other automation to every device in every branch on your network. Check out our SD-WAN ROI calculator for a customized estimate of how much money you can save by deploying SD-WAN on ZPE’s platform.

ZPE System’s Nodegrid solution combines branch networking, out-of-band management, and vendor-neutral orchestration into a single platform.

To learn more about using Nodegrid as your on-ramp to SD-WAN, or for help with the SD-WAN ROI calculator, contact ZPE Systems today

Contact Us

IoT in Finance Industry and Security Challenges

IoT in Finance Industry and Security Challenges
The Internet of Things (IoT) drives new innovations in the finance industry by empowering organizations to harvest more data, improve operational efficiency, and provide better customer service. However, adding dozens of low-touch devices to the network’s edge creates major security, privacy, and compliance challenges.

This post discusses how to take advantage of IoT in the finance industry by overcoming security challenges with automation, secure platforms, and vendor-neutral orchestration

IoT in the Finance Industry: Security Challenges and Solutions

The challenge: Unpatched, out-of-date IoT devices are easier to compromise for harvesting sensitive data.

The solution: Automated patch management using vendor-neutral management platforms that can dig their hooks into multi-vendor IoT.

The challenge: Unsecured remote management interfaces can be used by cybercriminals to access IoT devices and data.

The solution: Secure management hardware and software protected by robust security features like self-encrypted disk (SED) and two-factor authentication (2FA).

The challenge: It’s difficult to enforce security and privacy policies on remote IoT devices that process regulated financial data at the edge of the network.

The solution: A vendor-neutral security orchestration platform that extends Zero Trust Security policies and controls to multi-vendor IoT at the edge.

The challenge: It’s difficult to troubleshoot and resolve security incidents involving remote IoT devices without expensive, time-consuming truck rolls.

The solution: Secure out-of-band (OOB) management solutions that integrate with (or even directly host) third-party automation and AIOps tools.

The challenge: A lot of complexity is involved in gaining holistic security coverage over a distributed, multi-vendor financial network without leaving any gaps.

The solution: A vendor-neutral platform that unifies security and network management for the entire architecture behind a single pane of glass.

 

IoT in the finance industry: security challenges and solutions

There were over 10.54 million global IoT cybersecurity attacks in December 2022 alone. In the finance industry, a breach can result in significant consequences, including regulatory fines and irreparable reputational damage, which means IoT security must be a top priority. Let’s discuss the specific security challenges of using IoT in the finance industry.

Challenge #1: Keeping IoT devices up-to-date

IoT typically uses low-touch, set-it-and-forget-it devices, so they’re deployed around the network’s edge and receive little interaction from operators or technical staff. For example, IoT devices collect sensitive financial data from ATMs, self-service payment kiosks, and smartphone applications with little-to-no human oversight. That makes it easy for network teams to forget about operating system (OS) and software updates, especially when dozens or thousands of IoT devices are in use.

In fact, a recent report found that teams wait an average of 205 days to patch their infrastructure. This is a frightening statistic given that out-of-date software is rife with vulnerabilities just waiting to be exploited by cybercriminals looking for valuable financial data.

Solution: Automated patch management

Automating patches is the best way to ensure they’re installed on time. For example, many IoT device management systems provide dashboards where admins can see IoT device versioning information at-a-glance, manually deploy or roll-back updates, or create automated schedules/triggers to deploy those updates without manual intervention. However, most of these platforms only work within specific vendor ecosystems, which limits your capabilities. The best practice is to use a vendor-neutral IoT device management platform that can dig its hooks into multi-vendor IoT devices. This will ensure that critical IoT devices like credit card payment readers are kept secure and up-to-date.

 

A vendor-neutral IoT device management platform with automated patch management ensures that all devices are kept up-to-date and no vulnerabilities fall between the cracks.

Challenge #2: Securing remote management interfaces

Network admins typically work from a centralized location, which means they remotely access and manage IoT deployments at the branch and edge using jump boxes or serial consoles. If these remote management devices and interfaces aren’t adequately secured, malicious actors could use them to access IoT data and move laterally to other sensitive resources on the network. However, many admins deploy jump boxes without onboarding them with IT, which means they’re not added to security monitoring software and don’t have enterprise policies or controls applied. Serial consoles, on the other hand, often lack the advanced security features and integrations needed to protect them from cybercriminals.

Solution: Secure management hardware and software

The newest generation of serial consoles includes robust hardware security features and supports advanced authentication methods to safeguard remote management interfaces from compromise. A 3rd generation – or Gen 3 – serial console has onboard security features like a self-encrypted disk (SED), secure boot, BIOS protection, and geofencing, so malicious actors can’t access a stolen device. In addition, it supports SAML 2.0 authentication (via integrations with providers like Okta and Ping) and other advanced authentication methods to prevent unauthorized access to its software.

 

A Gen 3 serial console solution uses robust onboard security features and third-party security integrations to protect management hardware and interfaces.

Challenge #3: Complying with data privacy regulations

In a highly-regulated industry like finance, organizations must keep track of which people and devices can access sensitive data and ensure that permissions are granted on a least-privilege basis. Typically, achieving this level of granular control requires applying strict Zero Trust Security policies to every device and user accessing the network, including IoT devices at the edge. However, extending enterprise security policies and controls to the edge is difficult in a distributed, heterogeneous environment due to vendor lock-in.

For example, some branch networking solutions don’t support integrations with third-party identity management tools, forcing you to use their built-in access management settings. That means admins must manually recreate their Zero Trust data access policies in the router settings at every single branch and ensure they’re kept up-to-date.

Solution: Vendor-neutral Zero Trust Security orchestration

A centralized Zero Trust Security orchestration platform allows admins to deploy and manage security policies and controls across the network from a single place. A vendor-neutral platform can extend policy enforcement and other vital security controls to any device or application on the network. For example, you can apply the same Zero Trust data policies to all branch routers in the entire architecture to ensure consistent enforcement.  Such a platform makes compliance easier because financial organizations gain greater control over data access privileges and monitoring for IoT devices deployed anywhere in the world.

 

A vendor-neutral Zero Trust Security orchestration platform simplifies IoT data compliance by providing a centralized control panel to deploy and manage security policies across the entire distributed network architecture.

Challenge #4: Quickly resolving IoT security incidents

When malicious actors compromise an IoT device, financial organizations must act quickly to avoid regulatory fees and reputational damage. However, these devices are often deployed in remote, hard-to-reach locations with no technical or security staff nearby, such as in rural or island communities. That means problems require an expensive, time-consuming truck roll to resolve. Even with a team on-site, manual root cause analysis (RCA) and recovery efforts take a lot of time and effort, increasing both the duration and the expense of incidents.

Solution: Secure OOB with automation and AIOps support

The solution to this IoT security challenge involves out-of-band serial consoles and automation.

  • Out-of-band (OOB) serial consoles create a dedicated control plane to manage, troubleshoot, and recover remote devices and infrastructure. Admins access this control plane via alternative network interfaces that don’t rely on the production network at all. This means teams can still reach remote IoT devices even if the ISP goes down or the LAN is compromised by ransomware. The best practice is to use a Gen 3 serial console with advanced security features, as discussed above.
  • Automation and AIOps streamline the incident resolution process by automating RCA and recovery workflows. A Gen 3 OOB serial console solution can integrate or even directly host third-party automation and AIOps tools, ensuring teams always have remote access to their recovery toolkit during an outage or breach.

 

A secure, Gen 3 OOB serial console ensures 24/7 remote access to edge IoT deployments and supports automation and AIOps for faster security incident resolution.

Challenge #5: Gaining holistic security coverage

A distributed financial services network with many branches, ATMs, edge sites, and IoT devices has a large attack surface, so it requires several different security solutions to cover all potential vulnerabilities. Gaining complete security coverage over every IoT device in every location means deploying many appliances, each of which needs to be installed, patched, and managed, adding a lot of complexity to network and security operations and further increasing the attack surface. The need to orchestrate so many moving pieces increases the risk that security teams will make mistakes and prevent organizations from operating efficiently.

Solution: Unified, vendor-neutral security orchestration

A vendor-neutral security orchestration platform unifies a company’s security solutions and workflows under a single management umbrella. For example, the Nodegrid platform from ZPE Systems can dig its hooks into other vendors’ security appliances and virtual solutions, giving security analysts a holistic overview of the entire architecture from a single centralized portal. Teams can use Nodegrid to orchestrate firewalls, identity and access management (IAM), patches, secure access service edge (SASE), and more.

Nodegrid’s hardware can even directly host third-party security applications for a streamlined, consolidated branch deployment. You can use the Nodegrid platform to build a complete DCIM (data center infrastructure management), network management, and automation orchestration solution, streamlining operations with a truly unified experience.

A vendor-neutral security orchestration platform provides holistic security coverage while reducing complexity, which prevents human error and increases operational efficiency.

IoT in the finance industry and security challenges

Deploying IoT in the finance industry comes with security challenges, including patch management, unsecured management interfaces, policy enforcement, incident resolution, and complexity. The Nodegrid platform provides finance industry solutions to help you overcome each of these challenges, including:

A truly vendor-neutral platform that unifies security, network, and infrastructure management behind a single pane of glass for holistic coverage.

Ready to Learn More?

To learn more about deploying IoT in the finance industry and overcoming security challenges with Nodegrid, contact ZPE Systems.

Contact Us

Atsign: Why Choose ZPE Systems to Host IoT Security?

Colin

A Conversation with Atsign CTO & Co-Founder, Colin Constable

This is a guest post composed by Atsign, creators of zero-attack-surface solutions including atProtocol.

We recently sat down with our CTO and Mariposa Rotary Club extraordinaire, Colin Constable, to discuss our partnership with our friends over at ZPE Systems. Let’s explore the driving force behind this powerful partnership, and how together we’re securing IoT devices and the data shared between them.

Why is this partnership strategically important?

We are a software company that helps people connect beyond the edge of the Internet. And as a software company, we need to have hardware to run our software on. After looking at a number of hardware platforms, ZPE stood out as an organization that provides a strong array of network connectivity options. Our software running on ZPE’s hardware serves as an edge platform that gives customers reliable access to edge-generated data.

What are some of the synergies between Atsign and ZPE?

First and foremost, ZPE’s hardware was designed from scratch to provide the openness and flexibility that we were looking for in a hardware platform. If I were going to design something like this myself, it would look very much like a ZPE box! It is incredibly easy to drop our Docker containers straight onto the platform, and they just simply work, which is quite a joy. To have a Docker container environment on an edge box is really the thing that makes ZPE stand out as a platform. Combine that with the fact that ZPE boxes are running x86, which makes things easy–plus actually having dual SIM cards–we can work with our MVNO partners to provide constant connectivity; even if hardlines go down, there’s cellular backup. The thing we can offer ZPE and their customers is if the box can see the Internet, then you’ll be able to address it, get data to and from it, and actually even log into it, and get hold of the built-in UI on the box.

Tell us about ZPE’s Docker Container support

Our docker containers literally just ran perfectly on the ZPE hardware. I went into the UI, selected my docker container, and it just ran. It doesn’t get much easier than that. Plus, there’s the promise of being able to have the docker container talk to connected devices like V.24 cables to provide connectivity to IoT devices.

Once IoT devices become directly addressable, then it opens up all kinds of opportunities for more efficient delivery or sharing of information that can save customers tons of money by eliminating a lot of the current infrastructure they currently use to do that job.

What are some real-world use cases for Atsign and ZPE Systems?

Because ZPE boxes have lots of connectivity options (e.g. serial ports, 4/5G backhaul, and ethernet–with more coming!) for connecting IoT devices, then you can have always-on devices at the edge, and be able to address and get data to and from them. For example, a radio station that has DSL connectivity, and cellular backup would be able to just automatically move over to cellular backup, notify the radio station that it’s on cellular backup, but use that connectivity until the ADSL line comes back online and at all times be able to get information from the equipment at the radio station. This is critical for radio stations, as it eliminates “dead air,” that moment when the transmitter is not transmitting. Sponsors rely on radio stations to put out notifications for what their businesses are doing, so having constant, uninterrupted connectivity is essential.

Do Atsign & ZPE Systems improve sustainability?

Traditional solutions would have you installing many different boxes. What we really like about the ZPE platform is that although the hardware provides lots of connectivity options–that reduces the footprint for starters–there’s no need to have different modems and firewalls, and any other services can be added via docker containers, so you actually have an environment where you have a single box, and it can do multiple functions at the edge.

What are your final thoughts on the partnership between Atsign and ZPE Systems?

As a software company, we need hardware to deploy on. We especially need hardware that can sit on the edge with all the right connectivity points. Atsign and ZPE Systems is really a perfect combination of great software and great hardware at the edge.

Bonus: What is Colin’s favorite firewall configuration for a ZPE box?

My favorite firewall rule is the one that costs the least money, and is ultimately the most secure firewall ruleset: Deny All. If you’ve got Deny All, that means that you don’t have to deal with the pain and complexities of firewall rules in order to address devices, which is what the real cost of networking is these days; it’s not necessarily the hardware, it’s actually having people to administer firewall rulesets. Having zero network attack surfaces, having a Deny All ruleset, just means you don’t have to have people changing rulesets all the time, which is a good thing.

Opengear EOL: IM7200 Alternative Options

Opengear alternatives

The Opengear IM7200 is a line of out-of-band (OOB) serial consoles, also known as terminal servers, console servers, serial console servers, serial console routers, and serial console switches. The Infrastructure Manager (IM) solution provides consolidated remote management of data center infrastructure. The IM7200 is EOL as of the 31st of March, 2023, with an end-of-sale date of the 30th of September 2023 – click here to see a full list of affected product SKUs. In this blog, we’ll discuss replacement options for the IM7200, including Opengear alternatives that deliver unlimited automation capabilities and complete vendor freedom.

 

Table of contents:

Opengear IM7200 overview

The Opengear IM7200 is a line of serial console solutions that provide out-of-band (OOB) management for 8-48 devices. It’s designed to give administrators a dedicated control plane from which to access and manage remote infrastructure in data centers and large IT deployments.

With the IM7200 now EOL, Opengear recommends migrating to the OM2200 series. Let’s take a look at the features, specifications, and limitations of the Opengear OM2200 before discussing some alternative options.

 

Looking for replacement options for other discontinued serial consoles and branch routers? Try:

Opengear migration options: OM2200

The Opengear OM2200 Operations Manager console server solution provides OOB management for up to 48 devices over serial and/or Ethernet. OOB and failover use dual fiber ports, with an optional LTE-A Pro cellular module available. One of the OM2200’s biggest strengths is its power management capabilities, uniquely supporting over 100 power vendors’ equipment.

The OM series is Opengear’s line of NetOps console servers, which means they support Opengear’s automation modules as well as Python scripts and Docker container deployments. However, Zero Touch Provisioning (ZTP) and RESTful APIs are locked behind an upgraded version of Opengear’s Lighthouse software. In addition, the OM2200 is what’s known as a 2nd generation or “Gen 2” serial console, which means it isn’t vendor-neutral and can’t integrate or host third-party applications for automation or security.

Opengear OM2200 Features & Tech Specs

Notable Serial Console Features

• SSH direct to consoles

• Keystroke logging

• Alert on cable disconnects

• Text pattern match

• Multiple concurrent sessions

• Automatic device name discovery

OOB Managed Interfaces

• 16, 32, 48 ports

Hardware

• AMD X86, 64-bit CPU

• 8 GB DRAM

• 64 GB SSD

Automation

• Opengear NetOps modules

• Docker

• Python

• Perl and bash support

• Ruby

Automation for End Devices

• Can run playbooks

• Python

• Lighthouse

Guest OS

• Docker support

Power Management

• Monitor UPS battery status

• Automate routine maintenance and load testing

• Control PDU outlets via serial, USB, and Ethernet

• Enforce remote power permissions and map managed consoles to outlets

• Minimize MTTR with out-of-band power control

• Uniquely supports over 100 power vendors’ equipment

Hardware Security

• TPM 2.0

• Embedded firewall

Form Factor

Fixed 1RU

 

Opengear OM2200 limitations

The OM2200 is a good Gen 2 serial console switch that offers some major improvements over the IM7200, but it still falls short of delivering Gen 3 OOB console server functionality in the following ways.

  • Vendor lock-in: The X86 CPU and Linux-based OS makes the OM2200 programmable and extensible, but Opengear’s Lighthouse management software is not truly vendor-neutral. That means your third-party integration capabilities will be limited to specific supported solutions. If you have a hybrid, distributed, or multi-vendor infrastructure, this limitation could leave gaps in your management and orchestration coverage.
  • Limited automation: The OM2200 improves upon the 7200 by supporting Opengear NetOps modules and allowing scripting and ZTP within the Lighthouse Automation edition. However, this automation only extends to certain supported end-devices, which means you’ll either need to stay within Opengear’s ecosystem, or manually provision and deploy the rest of your infrastructure.
  • Lack of security: The OM2200 includes TPM 2.0 security, SAML 2.0 support, and an embedded firewall. However, it does not include additional hardware security like geofencing, BIOS protection, or UEFI secure boot. This increases the risk that a stolen serial console could be used by cybercriminals to breach your OOB management network.


Both the Opengear IM7200 and OM2200 are Gen 2 serial console servers, which means they provide OOB management access as well as some automation functionality to simplify individual network management workflows. However, due to vendor lock-in and minimal hardware security, the OM series falls short of the end-to-end automation and security required for a Gen 3 serial console solution.

Opengear alternative options from ZPE Systems

Another migration option for EOL Opengear console servers is the Nodegrid solution from ZPE Systems. This Gen 3 OOB management platform includes a wide range of serial console servers and integrated branch services routers to choose from, with the Nodegrid Serial Console Plus (NSCP), the Nodegrid Serial Console S Series, and the Noderid Net Services Router (NSR) serving as direct replacements for the IM7200.

Nodegrid Serial Console Plus (NSCP)

The high-density Nodegrid Serial Console Plus comes in 16, 32, 48, and 96 serial RJ45 port configurations as well as providing 2 USB 3.0 ports for a total of 98 managed devices on a single 1RU solution. That means a single NSCP could replace up to 12 Opengear IM7200 serial consoles, saving on hardware costs and optimizing rack space.

Nodegrid Serial Console S Series

The Nodegrid S series, which comes in 16, 32, or 48-port configurations, uses auto-sensing ports to provide seamless management of modern, legacy, and mixed-vendor infrastructure. The S Series RS232 serial console switch is the perfect legacy modernization platform because it allows you to extend automation to end devices that otherwise wouldn’t support it.

Nodegrid Net Services Router (NSR)

The Nodegrid Net Services Router (NSR) is an all-in-one branch networking solution that delivers OOB, SD-WAN, and more in a single box. The NSR has a modular design that lets you customize your solution with extra terminal server capabilities, storage, processing power, or GbE Ethernet ports.

All Nodegrid devices are secured with on-board features like BIOS protection, geofencing, TPM 2.0, and UEFI Secure Boot. An embedded firewall provides additional functionality like multi-site IPSec VPN, advanced authentication, and 2FA and SAML 2.0.

Nodegrid’s hardware can also directly host VMs, Docker containers, and third-party security and automation applications. Plus, the Linux-based Nodegrid OS supports NetOps automation and orchestration via integrations with tools like Docker, Chef, Puppet, and Ansible. In addition, ZPE’s management software, which is available as an on-premises or web-based solution, provides vendor-neutral visibility and orchestration of all your data center and cloud infrastructure behind one pane of glass.

Nodegrid features & tech specs

 

Nodegrid NSCP

Nodegrid S Series

Nodegrid NSR

Notable Serial Console Features

• SSH direct to consoles

• Keystroke logging

• Logging to ZPE Cloud, NFS, Local

• Alert on cable disconnects

• Text pattern match with scriptable actions

• Multiple concurrent sessions

• Automatic device name discovery

• Session sharing for collaboration

• IP address per serial port

• Secure session logout enforcement

• Power control hotkey on serial port

• Configurable icon per serial port

• SSH direct to consoles

• Keystroke logging

• Logging to ZPE Cloud, NFS, Local

• Alert on cable disconnects

• Text pattern match with scriptable actions

• Multiple concurrent sessions

• Automatic device name discovery

• Session sharing for collaboration

• IP address per serial port

• Secure session logout enforcement

• Power control hotkey on serial port

• Configurable icon per serial port

• SSH direct to consoles

• Keystroke logging

• Logging to ZPE Cloud, NFS, Local

• Alert on cable disconnects

• Text pattern match with scriptable actions

• Multiple concurrent sessions

• Automatic device name discovery

• Session sharing for collaboration

• IP address per serial port

• Secure session logout enforcement

• Power control hotkey on serial port

• Configurable icon per serial port

OOB Managed Interfaces

• 16, 32, 48, 96 ports (1RU)

• 16, 32, 48 ports

• Up to 5 x 16-port RJ-45 Serial modules

Hardware

• Intel X86, 64-bit CPU optimized for running VMs and automation tools

• Dual-SIM 5G/4G/LTE, Wi-Fi, and V.02 modem for OOB/Failover

• Intel X86, 64-bit CPU optimized for running VMs and automation tools

• Dual-SIM 5G/4G/LTE, Wi-Fi, and V.02 modem for OOB/Failover

• Intel X86, 64-bit CPU optimized for running VMs and automation tools

• Dual-SIM 5G/4G/LTE, Wi-Fi, and V.02 modem for OOB/Failover

Automation

• ZPE Cloud

• Chef

• Docker

• Puppet

• Python

• Ruby

• ShellScript

• Node.js JavaScript

• Red Hat Ansible

• KVM Hypervisor

• ZPE Cloud

• Chef

• Docker

• Puppet

• Python

• Ruby

• ShellScript

• Node.js JavaScript

• Red Hat Ansible

• KVM Hypervisor

• ZPE Cloud

• Chef

• Docker

• Puppet

• Python

• Ruby

• ShellScript

• Node.js JavaScript

• Red Hat Ansible

• KVM Hypervisor

Automation for End Devices

• ZPE Cloud

• Chef

• Docker

• Puppet

• Python

• Ruby

• ShellScript

• Node.js JavaScript

• Red Hat Ansible

• KVM Hypervisor

• ZPE Cloud

• Chef

• Docker

• Puppet

• Python

• Ruby

• ShellScript

• Node.js JavaScript

• Red Hat Ansible

• KVM Hypervisor

• ZPE Cloud

• Chef

• Docker

• Puppet

• Python

• Ruby

• ShellScript

• Node.js JavaScript

• Red Hat Ansible

• KVM Hypervisor

Guest OS

• VMs, Docker, Kubernetes, LXC

• VMs, Docker, Kubernetes, LXC

• VMs, Docker, Kubernetes, LXC

Power Management

• Supports major power strips manufacturers

• Power management integrated with serial session (escape sequence in the serial session or power buttons in web serial session)

• Power control of VMs

• Access rights for users & user groups

• Supports major power strips manufacturers

• Power management integrated with serial session (escape sequence in the serial session or power buttons in web serial session)

• Power control of VMs

• Access rights for users & user groups

• Supports major power strips manufacturers

• Power management integrated with serial session (escape sequence in the serial session or power buttons in web serial session)

• Power control of VMs

• Access rights for users & user groups

Hardware Security

• TPM 2.0

• Encrypted solid-state disk

• UEFI BIOS with protection

• Secure Boot (signed OS

• Geofencing

• TPM 2.0

• Encrypted solid-state disk

• UEFI BIOS with protection

• Secure Boot (signed OS

• Geofencing

• TPM 2.0

• Encrypted solid-state disk

• UEFI BIOS with protection

• Secure Boot (signed OS

• Geofencing

Form Factor

Fixed 1RU

Fixed 1RU

Modular 1RU

The Nodegrid Gen 3 serial console solution is an Opengear alternative that serves as a direct replacement for the IM7200 while delivering enhanced automation capabilities and complete vendor freedom.

Watch a free Nodegrid demo to see a Gen 3 console server solution in action.

Watch the Video

Opengear IM7200 migration SKUs:

Opengear IM7200 EOL SKU

In Scope Features

ZPE Replacement Product

IM7208-2-DAC

IM7208-2-DDC

8 Serial ports, OOB management

Fixed Form Factor:

ZPE-NSCP-T16R-STND-DAC

ZPE-NSC-T16S-STND-DAC

ZPE-NSCP-T16R-STND-DDC

ZPE-NSC-T16S-STND-DDC

 

Modular Form Factor:

ZPE-NSR-816-DAC with 1 x 16 port serial module 1 x ZPE-NSR-16SRL-EXPN

ZPE-NSR-816-DDC with 1 x 16 port serial module 1 x ZPE-NSR-16SRL-EXPN

IM7216-2-DAC

IM7216-2-DDC

16 Serial ports, OOB management

Fixed Form Factor:

ZPE-NSCP-T16R-STND-DAC

ZPE-NSC-T16S-STND-DAC

ZPE-NSCP-T16R-STND-DDC

ZPE-NSC-T16S-STND-DDC

 

Modular Form Factor:

ZPE-NSR-816-DAC with 1 x 16 port serial module 1 x ZPE-NSR-16SRL-EXPN

ZPE-NSR-816-DDC with 1 x 16 port serial module 1 x ZPE-NSR-16SRL-EXPN

IM7232-2-DAC

IM7232-2-DDC

32 Serial ports, OOB management

Fixed Form Factor:

ZPE-NSCP-T32R-STND-DAC

ZPE-NSC-T32S-STND-DAC

ZPE-NSCP-T32R-STND-DDC

ZPE-NSC-T32S-STND-DDC

 

Modular Form Factor:

ZPE-NSR-816-DAC with 2 x 16 port serial module 2 x ZPE-NSR-16SRL-EXPN

ZPE-NSR-816-DDC with 2 x 16 port serial module 2 x ZPE-NSR-16SRL-EXPN

IM7248-2-DAC

IM7248-2-DDC

48 Serial ports, OOB management

Fixed Form Factor:

ZPE-NSCP-T48R-STND-DAC

ZPE-NSC-T48S-STND-DAC

ZPE-NSCP-T48R-STND-DDC

ZPE-NSC-T48S-STND-DDC

 

Modular Form Factor:

ZPE-NSR-816-DAC with 3 x 16 port serial module 3 x ZPE-NSR-16SRL-EXPN

ZPE-NSR-816-DDC with 3 x 16 port serial module 3 x ZPE-NSR-16SRL-EXPN

96 port not available in IM or OM series

96 Serial ports, OOB management

ZPE-NSCP-T96R-STND-DAC

ZPE-NSCP-T96R-STND-DDC

Ready to replace your EOL Opengear IM7200 with a Gen 3 out-of-band serial console solution?

Call ZPE Systems today at 1-844-4ZPE-SYS for a special trade-in promotion.

Contact Us

Out-of-Band Recovery Kit – ZPE Systems at Cisco Live 2023

Webinars & Presentations

Out-of-Band Recovery Kit

Keep SD-WAN & Critical Infrastructure Operations Running

In this 90-second clip, Koroush Saraf shows how the Out-of-Band Recovery Kit keeps critical IT running. Deploy this versatile kit fast and instantly recover from outages using automation.

Discover the full problem and solution with our recent blog post, De-fusing Cisco SD-WAN Time-bomb.

 

Get your Out-of-Band Recovery Kit

HSR-KIT

Fill out the form to get your recovery kit!

ZPE Systems delivers innovative solutions to simplify infrastructure managment at the datacenter, branch, and edge.

Learn how our Zero Pain Ecosystem can solve your biggest network orchestration pain points.

Watch a Demo Contact Us

Video Wall