Providing Out-of-Band Connectivity to Mission-Critical IT Resources

PCI DSS 4.0 Requirements

Businessman,Using,Virtual,Touch,Screen,Clicks,Abbreviation:,Pci,Dss.,Concept
The Security Standards Council (SSC) of the Payment Card Industry (PCI) released the version 4.0 update of the Data Security Standard (DSS) in March 2022. PCI DSS 4.0 applies to any organization in any country that accepts, handles, stores, or transmits cardholder data. This standard defines cardholder data as any personally identifiable information (PII) associated with someone’s credit or debit card. The risks for PCI DSS 4.0 noncompliance include fines, reputational damage, and potentially lost business, so organizations must stay up to date with all recent changes.

The new requirements cover everything from protecting cardholder data to implementing user access controls, zero trust security measures, and frequent penetration (pen) testing. Each major requirement defined in the updated PCI DSS 4.0 is summarized below, with tables breaking down the specific compliance stipulations and providing tips or best practices for meeting them.

Citation: The PCI DSS v4.0

PCI DSS 4.0 requirements and best practices

Every PCI DSS 4.0 requirement starts with a stipulation that the processes and mechanisms for implementation are clearly defined and understood. The best practice involves updating policy and process documents as soon as possible after changes occur, such as when business goals or technologies evolve, and communicating changes across all relevant business units.

Jump to the other requirements below:

Build and maintain a secure network and systems

Requirement 1: Install and maintain network security controls

Network security controls include firewalls and other security solutions that inspect and control network traffic. PCI DSS 4.0 requires organizations to install and properly configure network security controls to protect payment card data.

Stipulations for Compliance

Best Practices

Network security controls (NSCs) are configured and maintained.

Validate network security configurations before deployment and use configuration management to track changes and prevent configuration drift.

Network access to and from the cardholder data environment (CDE) is restricted.

Monitor all inbound traffic to the CDE, even from trusted networks, and, when possible, use explicit “deny all” firewall rules to prevent accidental gaps.

Network connections between trusted and untrusted networks are controlled.

Implement a DMZ that manages connections between untrusted networks and public-facing resources on the trusted network.

Risks to the CDE from computing devices that can connect to both untrusted networks and the CDE are mitigated.

Use security controls like endpoint protection and firewalls to protect devices from Internet-based attacks and zero-trust and network segmentation to prevent lateral movement to CDEs.

Requirement 2: Apply secure configurations to all system components

Attackers often compromise systems using known default passwords or old, forgotten services. PCI DSS 4.0 requires organizations to properly configure system security settings and reduce the attack surface by turning off unnecessary software, services, and accounts.

Stipulations for Compliance

Best Practices

System components are configured and managed securely.

Continuously check for vendor-default user accounts and security configurations and ensure all administrative access is encrypted using strong cryptographic protocols.

Wireless environments are configured and managed securely.

Apply the same security standards consistently across wired and wireless environments, and change wireless encryption keys whenever someone leaves the organization.

Protect account data

Requirement 3: Protect stored account data

Any payment account data an organization stores must be protected by methods such as encryption and hashing. Organizations should also limit account data storage unless it’s necessary and, when possible, truncate cardholder data.

Stipulations for Compliance

Best Practices

Storage of account data is kept to a minimum.

Use data retention and disposal policies to configure an automated, programmatic procedure to locate and remove unnecessary account data.

Sensitive authentication data (SAD) is not stored after authorization.

Review data sources to ensure that the full contents of any track, card verification code, and PIN/PIN blocks are not retained after the authorization process is completed.

Access to displays of full primary account number (PAN) and ability to copy cardholder data are restricted.

Use role-based access control (RBAC) to limit PAN access to individuals with a defined need and use the masking approach to display only the number of digits needed for a specific function.

PAN is secured wherever it is stored.

Render PAN unreadable using one-way hashing with a randomly generated secret key, truncation, index tokens, and strong cryptography with secure key management.

Cryptographic keys used to protect stored account data are secured.

Manage cryptographic keys with a centralized key management system that’s PCI DSS 4.0 compliant to restrict access to key-encrypting keys and store them separately from data-encrypting keys.

Where cryptography is used to protect stored account data, key management processes and procedures covering all aspects of the key lifecycle are defined and implemented.

Use a key management solution that simplifies or automates key replacement for old or compromised keys.

Requirement 4: Protect cardholder data with strong cryptography during transmission over open, public networks

While requirement 3 applies to stored card data, requirement 4 outlines stipulations for protecting cardholder data in transit.

Stipulations for Compliance

Best Practices

PAN is protected with strong cryptography during transmission.

Encrypt PAN over both public and internal networks and apply strong cryptography at both the data level and the session level.

Maintain a vulnerability management program

Requirement 5: Protect all systems and networks from malicious software

Organizations must take steps to prevent malicious software (a.k.a., malware) from infecting the network and potentially exposing cardholder data.

Stipulations for Compliance

Best Practices

Malware is prevented, or detected and addressed.

Use a combination of network-based controls, host-based controls, and endpoint security solutions; supplement signature-based tools with AI/ML-powered detection.

Anti-malware mechanisms and processes are active, maintained, and monitored.

Update tools and signature databases as soon as possible and prevent end-users from disabling or altering anti-malware controls.

Anti-phishing mechanisms protect users against phishing attacks.

Use a combination of anti-phishing approaches, including anti-spoofing controls, link scrubbers, and server-side anti-malware.

Requirement 6: Develop and maintain secure systems and software

Development teams should follow PCI-compliant processes when writing and validating code. Additionally, install all appropriate security patches immediately to prevent malicious actors from exploiting known vulnerabilities in systems and software.

Stipulations for Compliance

Best Practices

Bespoke and custom software are developed securely.

Use manual or automatic code reviews to search for undocumented features, validate that third-party libraries are used securely, analyze insecure code structures, and check for logical vulnerabilities.

Security vulnerabilities are identified and addressed.

Use a centralized patch management solution to automatically notify teams of known vulnerabilities and pending updates.

Public-facing web applications are protected against attacks.

Use automatic vulnerability security assessment tools that include specialized web scanners that analyze web application protection.

Changes to all system components are managed securely.

Use a centralized source code version management solution to track, approve, and roll back changes.

Implement strong access control measures

Requirement 7: Restrict access to system components and cardholder data by business need-to-know

This PCI DSS 4.0 requirement aims to limit who and what has access to sensitive cardholder data and CDEs to prevent malicious actors from gaining access through a compromised, over-provisioned account. “Need to know” means that only accounts with a specific need should have access to sensitive resources; it’s often applied using the “least-privilege” approach, which means only granting accounts the specific privileges needed to perform a job role.

Stipulations for Compliance

Best Practices

Access to system components and data is appropriately defined and assigned.

Use RBAC to provide accounts with access privileges based on their job functions (e.g., ‘customer service agent’ or ‘warehouse manager’) rather than on an individual basis.

Access to system components and data is managed via an access control system.

Use a centralized identity and access management (IAM) system to manage access across the enterprise, including branches, edge computing sites, and the cloud.

Requirement 8: Identify users and authenticate access to system components

Organizations must establish and prove the identity of any users attempting to access CDEs or sensitive data. This requirement is core to the zero trust security methodology which is designed to limit the scope of data access and theft once an attacker has already compromised an account or system.

Stipulations for Compliance

Best Practices

User identification and related accounts for users and administrators are strictly managed throughout an account’s lifecycle.

Use an account lifecycle management solution to streamline account discovery, provisioning, monitoring, and deactivation.

Strong authentication for users and administrators is established and managed.

Replace relatively weak passwords/passphrases with stronger authentication factors like hardware tokens or biometrics.

Multi-factor authentication (MFA) is implemented to secure access into the CDE.

MFA should also protect access to management interfaces on isolated management infrastructure (IMI) to prevent attackers from controlling the CDE.

MFA systems are configured to prevent misuse.

Secure the MFA system itself with strong authentication and validate MFA configurations before deployment to ensure it requires two different forms of authentication and does not allow any access without a second factor.

Use of application and system accounts and associated authentication factors is strictly managed.

Whenever possible, disable interactive login on system and application accounts to prevent malicious actors from logging in with them.

Requirement 9: Restrict physical access to cardholder data

Malicious actors could gain access to cardholder data by physically interacting with payment devices or tampering with the hardware infrastructure that stores and processes that data. These PCI DSS 4.0 requirements outline how to prevent physical data access.

Stipulations for Compliance

Best Practices

Physical access controls manage entry into facilities and systems containing cardholder data.

Use logical or physical controls to prevent unauthorized users from connecting to network jacks and wireless access points within the CDE facility.

Physical access for personnel and visitors is authorized and managed.

Require visitor badges and an authorized escort for any third parties accessing the CDE facility, and keep an accurate log of when they enter and exit the building.

Media with cardholder data is securely stored, accessed, distributed, and destroyed.

Do not allow portable media containing cardholder data to leave the secure facility unless absolutely necessary.

Point of interaction (POI) devices are protected from tampering and unauthorized substitution.

Use a centralized, vendor-neutral asset management system to automatically discover and track all POI devices in use across the organization.

Use of application and system accounts and associated authentication factors is strictly managed.

Whenever possible, disable interactive login on system and application accounts to prevent malicious actors from logging in with them.

Regularly monitor and test networks

Requirement 10: Log and monitor all access to system components and cardholder data

User activity logging and monitoring will help prevent, detect, and mitigate CDE breaches. PCI DSS 4.0 requires organizations to collect, protect, and review audit logs of all user activities in the CDE.

Stipulations for Compliance

Best Practices

Audit logs are implemented to support the detection of anomalies and suspicious activity, and the forensic analysis of events.

Use a user and entity behavior analytics (UEBA) solution to monitor user activity and detect suspicious behavior with machine learning algorithms.

Audit logs are protected from destruction and unauthorized modifications.

Never store audit logs in public-accessible locations; use strong RBAC and least-privilege policies to limit access.

Audit logs are reviewed to identify anomalies or suspicious activity.

Use an AIOps tool to analyze audit logs, detect anomalous activity, and automatically triage and notify teams of issues.

Audit log history is retained and available for analysis.

Retain audit logs for at least 12 months in a secure storage location; keep the last three months of logs immediately accessible to aid in breach resolution.

Time-synchronization mechanisms support consistent time settings across all systems.

Use NTP to synchronize clocks across all systems to help with breach mitigation and post-incident forensics.

Failures of critical security control systems are detected, reported, and responded to promptly.

Use AIOps to automatically detect, triage, and respond to security incidents. AIOps also provides automatic root-cause analysis (RCA) for faster incident resolution.

Requirement 11: Test security of systems and network regularly

Researchers and attackers continuously discover new vulnerabilities in systems and software, so organizations must frequently test network components, applications, and processes to ensure that in-place security controls are still adequate. ge changes; ensure alerts are monitored.

Stipulations for Compliance

Best Practices

Wireless access points are identified and monitored, and unauthorized wireless access points are addressed.

Use a wireless analyzer to detect rogue access points.

External and internal vulnerabilities are regularly identified, prioritized, and addressed.

PCI DSS 4.0 requires internal and external vulnerability scans at least once every three months, but performing them more often is encouraged if your network is complex or changes frequently.

External and internal penetration testing is regularly performed, and exploitable vulnerabilities and security weaknesses are corrected.

Work with a PCI DSS-approved vendor to perform external and internal penetration testing; conduct pen testing on network segmentation controls.

Network intrusions and unexpected file changes are detected and responded to.

Use AI-powered, next-generation firewalls (NGFWs) with enhanced detection algorithms and automatic incident response capabilities.

Unauthorized changes on payment pages are detected and responded to.

Use anti-skimming technology like file integrity monitoring (FIM) to detect unauthorized payment page changes; ensure alerts are monitored.

Maintain an information security policy

Requirement 12: Support information security with organizational policies and programs

The final requirement is to implement information security policies and programs to support the processes described above and get everyone on the same page about their responsibilities regarding cardholder data privacy.

Stipulations for Compliance

Best Practices

Acceptable use policies for end-user technologies are defined and implemented.

Enforce usage policies with technical controls capable of locking users out of systems, applications, or devices if they violate these policies.

Risks to the cardholder data and environment are formally identified, evaluated, and managed.

Use a centralized patch management system to monitor firmware and software versions, detect changes that may increase risk, and deploy updates to fix vulnerabilities.

PCI DSS compliance is managed.

Service providers must assign executive responsibility for managing PCI DSS 4.0 compliance.

PCI DSS scope is documented and validated.

Frequently validate PCI DSS scope by evaluating the CDE and all connected systems to determine if coverage should be expanded.

Security awareness education is an ongoing activity.

Require all users to take security awareness training upon hire and every year afterwards; it’s also recommended to provide refresher training when someone transfers into a role with more access to sensitive data.

Personnel are screened to reduce risks from insider threats.

In addition to screening new hires, conduct additional screening when someone moves into a role with greater access to the CDE.

Risk to information assets associated with third-party service provider (TPSP) relationships is managed.

Thoroughly analyze the risk of working with third-parties based on their reporting practices, breach history, incident response procedures, and PCI DSS validation.

Third-party service providers (TPSPs) support their customers’ PCI DSS compliance.

Require TPSPs to provide their PCI DSS Attestation of Compliance (AOC) to demonstrate their compliance status.

Suspected and confirmed security incidents that could impact the CDE are responded to immediately.

Create a comprehensive incident response plan that designates roles to key stakeholders.

Isolate your CDE and management infrastructure with Nodegrid

The Nodegrid out-of-band (OOB) management platform from ZPE Systems isolates your control plane and provides a safe environment for cardholder data, management infrastructure, and ransomware recovery. Our vendor-neutral, Gen 3 OOB solution allows you to host third-party tools for automation, security, troubleshooting, and more for ultimate efficiency.

Ready to know more about PCI DSS 4.0 Requirements?

Learn how to meet PCI DSS 4.0 requirements for network segmentation and security by downloading our isolated management infrastructure (IMI) solution guide.
Download the Guide

DORA Act: 5 Takeaways For The Financial Sector

Thumbnail – DORA Act 5 Takeaways for the Financial Sector

The Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) is a regulatory initiative within the European Union that aims to enhance the operational resilience of the financial sector. Its main goal is to prevent and mitigate cyber threats and operational disruptions. The DORA Act outlines regulatory requirements for the security of network and information systems “whereby all firms need to make sure they can withstand, respond to and recover from all types of ICT-related disruptions and threats” (DORA Act website).

Who and What Are Covered Under the DORA Act?

The DORA Act is a regulation that covers all financial entities within the European Union (EU). It recognizes the critical role of information and communication technology (ICT) systems in financial services. DORA applies to financial services including payments, securities, credit rating, algorithmic trading, lending, insurance, and back-office operations. It establishes a framework for ICT risk management through technical standards, which are being released in two phases, the first of which was published on January 17, 2024. The DORA Act will go into effect in its entirety on January 17, 2025.

With cyberattacks constantly in the news cycle, it’s no surprise that governing bodies are putting forth standards for operational resilience. But without combing through this lengthy piece of legislation, what should IT teams start thinking about from a practical standpoint? Here are 5 takeaways on what the DORA Act means for the financial sector.

DORA Act: 5 Takeaways for the Financial Sector

1. Shore-up your cybersecurity measures

The DORA Act emphasizes strengthening cybersecurity measures within the financial sector. It requires financial institutions, such as banks, stock exchanges, and financial infrastructure providers, to implement robust cybersecurity controls and protocols. These include adopting advanced authentication mechanisms, encryption standards, and network segmentation to protect sensitive financial data and critical infrastructure from cyber threats. Part of this will also require organizations to apply system patches and updates in a timely manner, which means automated patching will become necessary to every organization’s security posture.

2. Implement resilience systems

Operational resilience is a key focus area of the DORA Act, aiming to ensure the continuity of essential financial services in the face of cyber threats, natural disasters, and other operational disruptions. Financial institutions are required to develop comprehensive business continuity plans, establish redundant systems and backup facilities, and conduct regular stress tests to assess their ability to withstand and recover from various scenarios. Implementing a resilience system helps with this, as it provides all the infrastructure, tools, and services necessary to continue operating during major incidents.

3. Conduct regular scans for vulnerabilities

The DORA Act mandates financial institutions to implement robust risk management practices to identify, assess, and mitigate cyber risks and operational vulnerabilities. This includes conducting regular assessments, vulnerability scans, and penetration tests, and developing incident response procedures to quickly address threats. This is all part of taking a proactive approach to identify and mitigate cyber incidents, and reduce the impact that adverse events have on financial stability and consumer confidence.

4. Collaborate and share information with industry peers

The DORA Act encourages financial institutions to share cybersecurity threat intelligence, incident data, and best practices with industry peers, regulators, and law enforcement agencies. The ability to monitor systems and collect data will be crucial to this approach, and will require systems that can rapidly (and securely) deploy apps/services during ongoing incidents. This will help financial institutions to better understand emerging threats, coordinate responses to cyber incidents, and strengthen collective defenses against threats and operational disruptions.

5. Segment physical and logical systems to pass regular audits

Through the DORA Act, regulators are empowered to conduct regular assessments, audits, and inspections of systems. This will ensure that financial institutions are implementing adequate controls and safeguards to protect against cyber threats and operational disruptions. A crucial part to this will involve physical and logical separation of systems, such as through Isolated Management Infrastructure, as well as implementing zero trust architecture across the organization. These will help bolster resilience by eliminating control dependencies between management and production networks, which will also help to streamline audits.

Get the blueprint to help you comply with the DORA Act

DORA’s requirements are meant to help IT teams better protect sensitive data and the integrity of financial systems as a whole. But without a proper network management infrastructure, their production networks are too sensitive to errors and vulnerable to attacks. ZPE has created the blueprint that covers these 5 crucial takeaways outlined in the DORA Act. The architecture outlined in this blueprint has been trusted by Big Tech for more than a decade, as it allows them to deploy modern cybersecurity measures, physically and logically separated systems, and rapid recovery processes. Download the blueprint now.

ISP Network Architecture

An engineer installs fiber optic patch cables at a customer site that’s part of an ISP network architecture.
Internet service providers (ISPs) are the backbone of modern society, responsible for connecting businesses, services, and people to the Internet and to each other. ISP networks are vast, distributed, and complex, making them challenging to manage effectively. However, failing to do so has major consequences. For example, in July of 2022, Rogers Communications in Canada suffered a network system failure after a maintenance update, causing an outage that lasted more than 15 hours and took down emergency services and other critical infrastructure.

An ISP network architecture must be designed for resilience to prevent major incidents from occurring that affect consumers, communities, and the provider’s reputation. But significant challenges stand in the way, including a reliance on legacy infrastructure, and an inability to troubleshoot and recover failed gear remotely. This post discusses why these challenges exist and what ISPs can do to overcome them.

ISP network architecture challenges

Many ISP networks lack resilience because providers are failing to adapt to a rapidly changing landscape. With networks growing larger and more complex every day, new technologies like AI (artificial intelligence) and software-defined networking are needed to manage infrastructure efficiently and deliver innovative services. Additionally, providers get stuck in a break-fix cycle that leaves teams struggling to maintain service level agreements or focus on innovation. Let’s look at the causes of these challenges and discuss how to build more resilient ISP network architectures.

Legacy infrastructure creates technical debt and hampers growth

The challenge:

The solution:

Reliance on legacy systems creates technical debt and prevents ISPs from implementing new technologies

Vendor-neutral platforms like Gen 3 serial consoles extend automation, software-defined networking, and other advanced technologies to legacy infrastructure until it can be replaced.

Internet service providers often have a network architecture that’s a mix of new and legacy infrastructure. However, engineers with the experience to support older solutions are no longer working in the field, either because they’ve been promoted to leadership positions or retired. When legacy hardware fails, inexperienced engineers need time to overcome this skills gap, and ISPs may even need to bring in consultants. This increases the cost of failures, creating what’s known as “technical debt” – when a solution is more expensive to support than the value it brings to the organization.

In addition, ISPs can improve network resilience and provide better service to customers, by adopting new technologies like AI, 5G, software-defined networking (SDN), and Network as a Service (NaaS). But legacy hardware hampers the ability to adopt these technologies. For example, NaaS abstracts the need for MPLS circuits and customer-premises gear, making architectures more cost-effective and improving the customer experience. NaaS brings SDN concepts like programmable networking and API-based operations to WAN & LAN services, hybrid cloud, Private Network Interconnect, and internet exchange points. It optimizes resource allocation by considering network and computing resources as a unified whole and attempts to automate as much as possible. The trouble is, ISPs struggle to implement NaaS and other beneficial new technologies because their legacy hardware simply can’t support it.

Solution: Legacy modernization with a vendor-neutral platform

The ideal solution is to replace legacy infrastructure with modern hardware and software that supports the latest technologies. But for many ISPs, an overhaul like this is too costly and intensive. The next-best option is to bridge the gap with a vendor-neutral network modernization platform that extends automation, AI, and 5G connectivity to otherwise unsupported systems.

For example, serial consoles (also known as terminal servers, console servers, and serial console switches) provide remote management access to network infrastructure. The newest generation of these devices, known as Gen 3, are vendor-neutral by design so that they can control third-party and legacy hardware. Through a combination of built-in features and integrations, Gen 3 serial consoles can use technology like zero-touch provisioning (ZTP), AIOps, and automated configuration management to control connected hardware that otherwise wouldn’t support it. Some solutions, such as the Nodegrid platform from ZPE Systems, can even directly host SDN and NaaS software from other vendors, so ISPs can start implementing network improvements right away while they gradually replace their outdated infrastructure.

Physical infrastructure is difficult to manage and troubleshoot remotely

The challenge:

The solution:

ISP network admins can’t respond to changing environmental conditions or recover failed hardware remotely

Environmental monitoring connected to an out-of-band (OOB) management solution ensures continuous remote access on a dedicated, isolated network that enables fast and cost-effective recovery.

ISP network architectures involve a great deal of physical infrastructure, which is often deployed in remote edge sites and customer premises. Even with software- or service-based network solutions, hardware is needed to host that software, and the physical environment for that hardware is often less than ideal. Drastic weather changes, power outages, and other unexpected scenarios can happen without notice and rapidly bring down an ISP network. These events often cut off remote management access as well, making troubleshooting and recovery difficult, time-consuming, and expensive. In fact, supporting this physical infrastructure often consumes so much time and effort that it prevents ISPs from focusing on delivering better services and software to their customers.

Solution: Out-of-band management with environmental monitoring

The first part of the solution involves monitoring the environment that houses remote, physical infrastructure. An environmental monitoring system uses sensors to detect changes in airflow, temperature, humidity, and other conditions that affect the operation of network hardware. These sensors give ISPs a virtual presence in edge deployments and customer sites so they can quickly respond to changing conditions before systems overheat or circuitry corrodes.

The second part involves providing management teams with reliable remote access to physical infrastructure that won’t go down if there’s a production network outage. Out-of-band (OOB) management solutions use serial consoles with dedicated network interfaces used just for management access. This creates a parallel, out-of-band network that’s completely isolated from production network services and infrastructure. Additionally, many serial consoles use cellular connectivity via 4G or 5G to OOB access, providing a wireless lifeline to connect, troubleshoot, and restore remote infrastructure. OOB management allows ISPs to troubleshoot and recover failed hardware remotely, even during total network outages, so they can get services back up and running faster and less expensively.

The environmental monitoring system should run on the OOB network so remote admins can continue to monitor conditions while they recover failed hardware. The out-of-band management solution also needs to be vendor-neutral so ISPs can deploy third-party automation, AI, and NaaS on the OOB network. For example, Nodegrid Gen 3 serial consoles provide OOB, environmental monitoring, and a vendor-neutral platform to host third-party software at the edge. Nodegrid even enables fully automated responses to changing environmental conditions in those edge environments before admins are aware of a problem.

To learn more about building a resilient, automated network infrastructure with Nodegrid, download the Network Automation Blueprint.

Download Now

ISP network architecture resilience with Nodegrid

ISP network architectures must be resilient, meaning service providers must find a way to bridge the gap between legacy and modern systems while ensuring continuous remote access to manage, troubleshoot, and recover hardware at the edge. The Nodegrid ISP network infrastructure solution  from ZPE Systems is a vendor-neutral, Gen 3 platform that delivers legacy modernization, environmental monitoring, out-of-band management, and much more.

Nodegrid delivers ISP network architecture resilience in a single platform

Request a free demo to see Nodegrid ISP network architecture solutions in action.

Watch a Demo

Intel NUC Use Cases

A mini-PC similar to an Intel NUC.

The Intel NUC, or “Next Unit of Computing,” is a small, appliance-like minicomputer that’s widely used across a variety of industries and applications. They’re tiny and relatively inexpensive, so you’ll often find them inside IoT devices and ruggedized cases. They’re also frequently deployed as jump boxes or service delivery appliances. However, Intel NUCs create added security risks, technical debt, and management headaches. Plus, Intel recently announced the discontinuation of all NUC product lines. This post describes some of the most common Intel NUC use cases, explains the security and management issues that caused its discontinuation, and provides superior replacement options.

Table of Contents

  1. Intel NUC use cases
  2. Intel NUC EOL products
  3. Why is Intel EOL-ing the NUC?
  4. Intel NUC replacement options from ZPE Systems
  5. Nodegrid product comparison
  6. Intel NUC replacement SKUs

Intel NUC use cases

While Intel NUCs have a dedicated fanbase among home enthusiasts, they’re primarily used by professional IT teams. Some popular Intel NUC use cases include:

  • Reducing carbon footprints: As investors place more importance on an organization’s environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices, it becomes necessary to improve sustainability and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Replacing inefficient PC towers with Intel NUCs can help reduce carbon footprints and improve ESG ratings.
  • Security and surveillance systems: An Intel NUC can run a wide range of security applications for things like entry control and surveillance cameras, eliminating the need for dedicated servers. Some IoT (Internet of Things) security devices have embedded Intel NUCs for greater mobility and efficiency.
  • Application delivery: Some service providers use Intel NUCs as platforms to deploy their software on-site to reduce hardware overhead costs. For example, a provider can install a NUC in their customer’s server room to deliver artificial intelligence (AI) or Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) applications.
  • Jump boxes: Managed Service Providers (MSPs) and Managed Security Service Providers (MSSPs) often deploy Intel NUCs at customer sites to act as “jump boxes” used to remotely access client infrastructure without taking up rack space.
  • Rugged computing: When services are needed out in the field, such as in military or construction applications, a traditional laptop may not be heavy-duty enough to withstand operating conditions. Some organizations solve this problem by running their services on Intel NUCs installed inside rugged cases designed for the environment.
  • Customized appliance computing: For specialized applications requiring a high degree of physical customization, such as law enforcement surveillance systems, an Intel NUC is often used because it’s small enough to fit nearly any case.

Intel NUC EOL products

Intel recently announced it’s discontinuing all NUC products, with specific dates for end-of-sale, end-of-support, and end-of-security-support varying by product. ASUS agreed to take over manufacturing and support of NUC product lines, but it’s unclear what the transition will look like or how ASUS will develop the NUC in the future.

Click here to view a list of all Intel NUC end-of-life SKUs as well as direct replacement options.

Why is Intel EOL-ing the NUC?

Despite all the exciting enterprise use cases listed above, the Intel NUC was never intended to be used as an appliance. It has numerous security and management limitations that make it challenging for Intel (and ASUS, in the future) to support the NUC for enterprise applications, including:

  • There’s no dedicated platform to deploy or secure NUC applications
  • Each Intel NUC is managed and accessed individually with no centralized management
  • Intel NUCs create a lot of technical debt because they require a lot of coding, API knowledge, and other specialized skills to work with
  • NUC operating systems are usually left out of patch schedules, leaving vulnerabilities critically exposed
  • There is usually no ability to recover a non-responsive NUC remotely, requiring expensive on-site visits any time there’s a network hiccup or OS crash
  • NUCs often don’t have the onboard hardware Roots of Trust (e.g., TPM) needed to secure them properly
  • The hardware NUCs are embedded in often have unclear or undocumented supply chains
  • There’s no ability for bidirectional authentication to the cloud with unique certificates
  • The production data and applications are on the same plane as management processes, leaving management ports exposed

Intel NUCs are a quick and inexpensive way to deploy applications, jump boxes, and digital services, which is what makes them so popular in enterprises. However, due to a lack of security features and centralized management, NUCs are also popular with cybercriminals looking for an easy target to exploit. With Intel discontinuing all NUC product lines, it’s the perfect opportunity to look for a replacement option that delivers the same cost-efficient flexibility but with enterprise-grade security and management features built in.

Intel NUC replacement options from ZPE Systems

Nodegrid is a family of all-in-one networking, application delivery, and infrastructure management devices from ZPE Systems. Nodegrid was built with security in mind, taking a three-pronged approach that includes:

  1. Hardware security – Onboard security features like TPM 2.0 and self-encrypted disk (SED) protect your device even if it falls into the wrong hands.
  2. Software security – Nodegrid protects its software using features such as BIOS protection and Signed OS, and it can host third-party security applications for an even stronger defense.
  3. Management security – Nodegrid keeps the management plane isolated from the data plane and uses strong zero-trust authentication methods to protect your management interfaces.

Nodegrid reduces management headaches without reducing security or functionality. ZPE provides enterprise-level support for all Nodegrid products with a responsive engineering team and 24-hour CVE (common vulnerabilities and exposures) patching. Nodegrid also lowers the technical debt and can meet teams at their skill level. You can deploy Nodegrid and use it to manage solutions that are already in place without any specialized programming or API knowledge.

Plus, Nodegrid uses out-of-band (OOB) management and serial connectivity to ensure continuous remote access to the control plane, making it a superior choice to an Intel NUC jump box for MSPs and MSSPs. With OOB connection options like 5G/4G LTE, teams can remotely troubleshoot and recover systems, services, and applications, even during major network outages. Management of all Nodegrid-connected infrastructure is unified by a single platform for streamlined control at any scale.

Due to its size, cost, and open, Linux-based operating system, Nodegrid is just as flexible and efficient as an Intel NUC while delivering the centralized management, robust security, and responsive support needed in enterprise deployments.

Learn more about replacing mini-computers with enterprise solutions:

Nodegrid product comparison

The entire family of Nodegrid edge solutions provides reliable OOB management and flexible service delivery capabilities protected by enterprise-grade security features. The Nodegrid Mini SR, Bold SR, and Gate SR are direct replacements for EOL Intel NUC models but offer so much more. Nodegrid is an entire Services Delivery Platform designed to streamline operations at any scale.

 

Mini SR

Bold SR

Hive SR

Gate SR

CPU

X86-64bit Intel 

X86-64bit Intel

 

X86-64bit Intel 

Cores

4

4 or 8

4 or 8

2, 4 or 8

Guest VM

1

1

1-3

1-3

Guest Docker

2+

2+

2+

2+

Storage

14GB SED

32GB – 128GB

32GB – 128GB

32GB – 128GB

Additional Storage

Up to 4TB

512GB

Up to 4TB

Wi-Fi

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Cellular modem

1

1-2

1-2

1-2

5G

Yes

Dual 5G

Dual 5G

Sim slots

1

4

4

4

Serial Console Switch

Via USB

8

Via USB

8

Network

2x 1Gb ETH

5x Gb ETH

2x WAN (ETH/SFP)
2x SFP

4x 2.5Gb ETH

2x SFP
5x Gb ETH

4x 1Gb ETH PoE+

Data Sheet

Download

Download

Download

Download

To see first-hand why Nodegrid edge solutions are a superior choice for Intel NUC use cases, request a demo from ZPE Systems today.

Schedule a Demo

Intel NUC replacement SKUs

Intel NUC EOL SKU

In scope features

ZPE replacement product

Intel® NUC 11 Performance Kit NUC11PAHI70900

(Lenovo)

Multi-core Intel processor, expandable memory & SSD storage, Wi-Fi

ZPE-MSR24-W5

ZPE-MSR24-4G-W5

ZPE-MSR24-W5-EXT

ZPE-MSR24-4G-W5-EXT

ZPE-BSR-24a-W5

ZPE-BSR-24-4G-W5

ZPE-BSR-24-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-BSR-48-W5

ZPE-BSR-48-4G-W5

ZPE-BSR-48-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-GSR-48-W5

ZPE-GSR-48-4G-W5

ZPE-GSR-48-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-GSR-816-W5

ZPE-GSR-816-4G-W5

ZPE-GSR-816-4G-W5-D128G

Intel® NUC 11 Pro Kit NUC11TNKv5

Intel® NUC 11 Pro Board NUC11TNBv5

Intel® NUC 11 Pro Board NUC11TNBv7

Intel® NUC 11 Pro Kit NUC11TNHv50L

Intel® NUC 11 Pro Kit NUC11TNKv7

Intel® NUC 11 Pro Kit NUC11TNHv7

Intel® NUC 11 Pro Kit NUC11TNHv70L

Intel® NUC 11 Pro Board NUC11TNBi3

Intel® NUC 11 Pro Board NUC11TNBi5

Intel® NUC 11 Pro Board NUC11TNBi7

Intel® NUC 11 Pro Kit NUC11TNKi3

Intel® NUC 11 Pro Kit NUC11TNKi5

Intel® NUC 11 Pro Kit NUC11TNKi7

Intel® NUC 11 Pro Kit NUC11TNHi30L

Intel® NUC 11 Pro Kit NUC11TNHi50L

Intel® NUC 11 Pro Kit NUC11TNHi70L

Intel® NUC 11 Pro Kit NUC11TNHi3

Intel® NUC 11 Pro Kit NUC11TNHi5

Intel® NUC 11 Pro Kit NUC11TNHi7

Intel® NUC 11 Pro Kit NUC11TNHi30P

Intel® NUC 11 Pro Kit NUC11TNHi50W

Intel® NUC 11 Pro Kit NUC11TNHi70Q

Intel® NUC 11 Pro Board NUC11TNBi30Z

Intel® NUC 11 Pro Board NUC11TNBi50Z

Intel® NUC 11 Pro Board NUC11TNBi70Z

Intel® NUC 11 Pro Kit NUC11TNKi30Z

Intel® NUC 11 Pro Kit NUC11TNKi50Z

Intel® NUC 11 Pro Kit NUC11TNKi70Z

Intel® NUC 11 Pro Kit NUC11TNKv50Z

Intel® NUC Kit, NUC11PAHi30Z

Intel® NUC Kit, NUC11PAHi50Z

Intel® NUC Kit, NUC11PAHi70Z

Intel® NUC 11 Enterprise Edge Compute NUC11TNHv50L

Intel® NUC 11 Enterprise Edge Compute NUC11TNHv70L

Intel® NUC 11 Pro Kit NUC11TNHi50Z

Multi-core Intel processor, expandable memory & SSD storage, Wi-Fi

ZPE-MSR24-W5

ZPE-MSR24-4G-W5

ZPE-MSR24-W5-EXT

ZPE-MSR24-4G-W5-EXT

ZPE-BSR-24a-W5

ZPE-BSR-24-4G-W5

ZPE-BSR-24-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-BSR-48-W5

ZPE-BSR-48-4G-W5

ZPE-BSR-48-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-GSR-48-W5

ZPE-GSR-48-4G-W5

ZPE-GSR-48-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-GSR-816-W5

ZPE-GSR-816-4G-W5

ZPE-GSR-816-4G-W5-D128G

Intel® NUC Kit, NUC10i5FNHN

     (no cord, US cord, EU cord, AU cord, IN cord)

Intel® NUC Kit, NUC10i5FNKN

     (no cord, US cord, EU cord, AU cord, IN cord)

Intel® NUC Kit, NUC10i3FNHN

     (no cord, US cord, EU cord, AU cord, IN cord)

Multi-core Intel processor, expandable memory & SSD storage, Wi-Fi

ZPE-MSR24-W5

ZPE-MSR24-4G-W5

ZPE-MSR24-W5-EXT

ZPE-MSR24-4G-W5-EXT

ZPE-BSR-24a-W5

ZPE-BSR-24-4G-W5

ZPE-BSR-24-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-BSR-48-W5

ZPE-BSR-48-4G-W5

ZPE-BSR-48-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-GSR-48-W5

ZPE-GSR-48-4G-W5

ZPE-GSR-48-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-GSR-816-W5

ZPE-GSR-816-4G-W5

ZPE-GSR-816-4G-W5-D128G

Intel® NUC11 Enthusiast Kit, NUC11PHKi7C, with Core™ i7, RTX 2060

     (no cord, US cord, EU cord, UK cord, AU cord, CN cord)

Multi-core Intel processor, expandable memory & SSD storage, Wi-Fi

ZPE-MSR24-W5

ZPE-MSR24-4G-W5

ZPE-MSR24-W5-EXT

ZPE-MSR24-4G-W5-EXT

ZPE-BSR-24a-W5

ZPE-BSR-24-4G-W5

ZPE-BSR-24-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-BSR-48-W5

ZPE-BSR-48-4G-W5

ZPE-BSR-48-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-GSR-48-W5

ZPE-GSR-48-4G-W5

ZPE-GSR-48-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-GSR-816-W5

ZPE-GSR-816-4G-W5

ZPE-GSR-816-4G-W5-D128G

Intel® NUC Kit, NUC10i5FNHN

Intel® NUC Kit, NUC10i3FNHN

Multi-core Intel processor, expandable memory & SSD storage, Wi-Fi

ZPE-MSR24-W5

ZPE-MSR24-4G-W5

ZPE-MSR24-W5-EXT

ZPE-MSR24-4G-W5-EXT

ZPE-BSR-24a-W5

ZPE-BSR-24-4G-W5

ZPE-BSR-24-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-BSR-48-W5

ZPE-BSR-48-4G-W5

ZPE-BSR-48-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-GSR-48-W5

ZPE-GSR-48-4G-W5

ZPE-GSR-48-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-GSR-816-W5

ZPE-GSR-816-4G-W5

ZPE-GSR-816-4G-W5-D128G

Intel® NUC Board NUC7PJYBN

Multi-core Intel processor, expandable memory & SSD storage, Wi-Fi

ZPE-MSR24-W5

ZPE-MSR24-4G-W5

ZPE-MSR24-W5-EXT

ZPE-MSR24-4G-W5-EXT

ZPE-BSR-24a-W5

ZPE-BSR-24-4G-W5

ZPE-BSR-24-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-BSR-48-W5

ZPE-BSR-48-4G-W5

ZPE-BSR-48-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-GSR-48-W5

ZPE-GSR-48-4G-W5

ZPE-GSR-48-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-GSR-816-W5

ZPE-GSR-816-4G-W5

ZPE-GSR-816-4G-W5-D128G

Intel® NUC 11 Enthusiast Mini PC, w/ Core™

i7, RTX 2060, Optane™ Mem H10 

(32GB+512GB) Solid State Storage, 16G 

RAM, Windows® 10

     (No cord, US Cord, EU Cord, CN cord)

Multi-core Intel processor, expandable memory & SSD storage, Wi-Fi

ZPE-MSR24-W5

ZPE-MSR24-4G-W5

ZPE-MSR24-W5-EXT

ZPE-MSR24-4G-W5-EXT

ZPE-BSR-24a-W5

ZPE-BSR-24-4G-W5

ZPE-BSR-24-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-BSR-48-W5

ZPE-BSR-48-4G-W5

ZPE-BSR-48-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-GSR-48-W5

ZPE-GSR-48-4G-W5

ZPE-GSR-48-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-GSR-816-W5

ZPE-GSR-816-4G-W5

ZPE-GSR-816-4G-W5-D128G

Intel® NUC 8 Rugged Kit NUC8CCHKRN (All SKUs)

Intel® NUC 8 Rugged Board NUC8CCHBN (All SKUs)

Multi-core Intel processor, expandable memory & SSD storage, Wi-Fi

ZPE-MSR24-W5

ZPE-MSR24-4G-W5

ZPE-MSR24-W5-EXT

ZPE-MSR24-4G-W5-EXT

ZPE-BSR-24a-W5

ZPE-BSR-24-4G-W5

ZPE-BSR-24-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-BSR-48-W5

ZPE-BSR-48-4G-W5

ZPE-BSR-48-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-GSR-48-W5

ZPE-GSR-48-4G-W5

ZPE-GSR-48-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-GSR-816-W5

ZPE-GSR-816-4G-W5

ZPE-GSR-816-4G-W5-D128G

Intel® NUC Kit – NUC10i7FNHN

Intel® NUC Kit – NUC10i7FNKN

Multi-core Intel processor, expandable memory & SSD storage, Wi-Fi

ZPE-MSR24-W5

ZPE-MSR24-4G-W5

ZPE-MSR24-W5-EXT

ZPE-MSR24-4G-W5-EXT

ZPE-BSR-24a-W5

ZPE-BSR-24-4G-W5

ZPE-BSR-24-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-BSR-48-W5

ZPE-BSR-48-4G-W5

ZPE-BSR-48-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-GSR-48-W5

ZPE-GSR-48-4G-W5

ZPE-GSR-48-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-GSR-816-W5

ZPE-GSR-816-4G-W5

ZPE-GSR-816-4G-W5-D128G

Intel® NUC Kit – NUC7CJYHN (All SKUs)

Intel® NUC Kit – NUC7PJYHN (All SKUs)

Multi-core Intel processor, expandable memory & SSD storage, Wi-Fi

ZPE-MSR24-W5

ZPE-MSR24-4G-W5

ZPE-MSR24-W5-EXT

ZPE-MSR24-4G-W5-EXT

ZPE-BSR-24a-W5

ZPE-BSR-24-4G-W5

ZPE-BSR-24-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-BSR-48-W5

ZPE-BSR-48-4G-W5

ZPE-BSR-48-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-GSR-48-W5

ZPE-GSR-48-4G-W5

ZPE-GSR-48-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-GSR-816-W5

ZPE-GSR-816-4G-W5

ZPE-GSR-816-4G-W5-D128G

Intel® NUC 9 Pro Kit – NUC9VXQNX

Intel® NUC 9 Pro Compute Element – NUC9VXQNB

Intel® NUC 9 Pro Compute Element – NUC9V7QNB

Multi-core Intel processor, expandable memory & SSD storage, Wi-Fi

ZPE-MSR24-W5

ZPE-MSR24-4G-W5

ZPE-MSR24-W5-EXT

ZPE-MSR24-4G-W5-EXT

ZPE-BSR-24a-W5

ZPE-BSR-24-4G-W5

ZPE-BSR-24-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-BSR-48-W5

ZPE-BSR-48-4G-W5

ZPE-BSR-48-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-GSR-48-W5

ZPE-GSR-48-4G-W5

ZPE-GSR-48-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-GSR-816-W5

ZPE-GSR-816-4G-W5

ZPE-GSR-816-4G-W5-D128G

Intel® NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSKi50Z

Intel® NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSHi50Z

Intel® NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSKi70Z

Intel® NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSHi70Z

Multi-core Intel processor, expandable memory & SSD storage, Wi-Fi

ZPE-MSR24-W5

ZPE-MSR24-4G-W5

ZPE-MSR24-W5-EXT

ZPE-MSR24-4G-W5-EXT

ZPE-BSR-24a-W5

ZPE-BSR-24-4G-W5

ZPE-BSR-24-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-BSR-48-W5

ZPE-BSR-48-4G-W5

ZPE-BSR-48-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-GSR-48-W5

ZPE-GSR-48-4G-W5

ZPE-GSR-48-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-GSR-816-W5

ZPE-GSR-816-4G-W5

ZPE-GSR-816-4G-W5-D128G

Intel® NUC 9 Extreme Kit – NUC9i5QNX

Intel® NUC 9 Extreme Kit – NUC9i7QNX

Intel® NUC 9 Extreme Kit – NUC9i9QNX

Multi-core Intel processor, expandable memory & SSD storage, Wi-Fi

ZPE-MSR24-W5

ZPE-MSR24-4G-W5

ZPE-MSR24-W5-EXT

ZPE-MSR24-4G-W5-EXT

ZPE-BSR-24a-W5

ZPE-BSR-24-4G-W5

ZPE-BSR-24-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-BSR-48-W5

ZPE-BSR-48-4G-W5

ZPE-BSR-48-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-GSR-48-W5

ZPE-GSR-48-4G-W5

ZPE-GSR-48-4G-W5-D128G

ZPE-GSR-816-W5

ZPE-GSR-816-4G-W5

ZPE-GSR-816-4G-W5-D128G

Want to learn more about replacing your Intel NUC with Nodegrid?

Ready to replace your Intel NUC with a Nodegrid alternative? Call ZPE Systems today at 1-844-4ZPE-SYS or contact us online.

Contact Us

99.999% Uptime for a Top-10 Engineering School

Providing low-level remote access and automation saves hundreds of hours per month for the university’s small IT team

One of the largest universities in the United States fosters academics and research for nearly 40,000 students, staff, and researchers. The university sits among the top 10 schools for engineering, and heavily integrates technology into all disciplines, including engineering, computer sciences, and agricultural studies.

The university received a grant to expand, update, and connect their network of campuses, while enhancing infrastructure and mobility, resiliency, and campus amenities.  But having more than 200 on-campus buildings presents a challenge. The campus is home to academic facilities as well as a hospital, airport, 60,000-seat sports stadium, and dozens of leased spaces for local businesses. This makes the university equivalent to a small city, and its network infrastructure is what keeps it all connected.

Their small IT team was responsible for maintaining more than 10,000 management devices, most of which were long past EOL and frequently failing. They needed a refresh, but with a solution that could also reduce the hundreds of hours they spent every month on travel and on-site work. To maximize their day-to-day efficiency, they required a solution that could overcome these operational gaps:

  • Reducing the 100-150 hours of monthly travel times, by giving engineers the ability to fully access their stack remotely
  • Reducing the 80-120 hours of monthly on-site work required to maintain the 99.999% SLA, by automating manual jobs such as patching and firmware upgrades
  • Expanding their management headroom and use-case adaptability, by migrating to IPv6 and reducing the existing 6RU device stack

Download the full case study to see how ZPE’s Nodegrid hardware and software solved these problems.

EngineeringSchoolCover

Download the full case study

Problems and Gaps

The university is one of the largest in the United States. It sits among the nation’s top 50 schools for research expenditures, and heavily integrates technology into all disciplines, including engineering. Its main campus is home to more than 200 buildings that sit on over 2,500 acres of land. The campus is essentially a small city, and the university’s network infrastructure keeps it all connected.

This network infrastructure, however, was well beyond EOL and in disrepair. But rather than simply upgrade to newer devices, the university’s small IT team wanted to improve the overall quality of life well into the future. This meant addressing three gaps:

  • Inefficient management at scale — Each engineer spent an average of ten hours per month on travel alone, just to traverse the campus’ wide footprint and get to each MDF/IDF closet.
  • Too much focus on ops — The aging infrastructure was on the brink of collapse and required each engineer to spend eight hours per month in on-site work, just to keep devices running.
  • Too many devices — The infrastructure includes roughly 10,000 devices to manage, which was exhausting IP on their limited IPv4 network and too rigid to fit in tight spaces, like their remote farm closets and research labs.

Solution

The university deployed the full lineup of Nodegrid devices, including the Nodegrid Serial Console, Nodegrid Services Routers, and Nodegrid Manager. These allowed them to overcome all three gaps using remote management, automation, and consolidated functionality, to save engineers hundreds of hours every month. Download the full case study to see the complete solution and benefits.

Need Help Replacing End-of-Life Gear?

Check out our complete products and services package to make your EOL transition seamless. Choose from a variety of Synopsys-validated devices, get a generous trade-in discount, and let our engineers install and configure into your environment. Click below to explore this offer and more customer case studies.

Cisco 2900 EOL: Replacement Options

cisco 2900 eol

The Cisco ISR 2900 series of branch routers went EOS (end-of-sale) on the 9th of December 2017, and Cisco concluded support on the 31st of December 2022. In this guide, we’ll compare migration options for the Cisco ISR 2900 EOL models to help you select a solution that supports your business use case, deployment size, and future growth.

Disclaimer: This comparison was written by a third party in collaboration with ZPE Systems using data gathered from publicly available data sheets and admin guides, as of 5/12/2023. Please email us if you have corrections or edits, or want to review additional attributes: Matrix@zpesystems.com

 

Table of Contents

Cisco ISR 2900 overview

The Cisco ISR 2900 is a line of enterprise gateway routers designed for branch and edge networking. It’s a modular solution that can be expanded with optional Network Interface Modules (NIMs) and Service Modules (SMs) for more functionality. There are two primary use cases for the 2900:

Converged branch networking – The ISR 2900 easily integrates with Cisco’s SD-WAN, SD-Branch, cloud security, and DNA network management software, can be extended with optional modules for added hardware capabilities, and supports NFV (network functions virtualization) for all-in-one branch networking.

Out-of-band (OOB) management – Using serial port modules, the ISR 2900 turns into an out-of-band (OOB) serial console solution that provides remote management access to the control plane of branch infrastructure.

The ISR 2900 is officially EOL as of the 31st of December 2022. The EOL models include all 2901, 2911, 2921, and 2951 ISR product SKUs.

Looking for replacement options for your other Cisco ISR EOL products? Read our guide to Cisco ISR EOL Replacement Options.

 

Cisco 2900 EOL replacement options

The discontinuation of the Cisco 2900 has left many organizations looking for migration options. Let’s compare two direct replacements from Cisco before discussing alternative options that deliver better branch management capabilities and greater opportunities for automation.

Cisco ISR 1100

Cisco ISR 1100 is a series of enterprise branch routers, though in this comparison we’re only looking at the models that support SD-WAN and thus serve as direct replacements for the discontinued 2900 models. The capabilities of the 1100 series vary, mostly because only some of the models are modular. For example, the fixed form-factor 1100-4G/4G LTE models have cellular functionality but offer fewer networking and security features. Conversely, the 1161X-8P and 112x-8P models are modular and can be extended with optional modules (like cellular for the 1161X or terminal server ports for the 112x-8P).

Even with these expansions, the compact ISR 1100s are best suited for smaller deployments in branch offices or small, provider-managed edge data centers. If your organization uses the ISR 2900 for converged branch networking, the 1100s are the closest Cisco replacement, though it supports OOB serial modules as well.

Cisco Catalyst C8300

The Cisco Catalyst C8300 series is a modular branch and edge networking solution, though due to its large size, it’s sometimes used as a primary on-premises gateway router. There are four models to choose from – two 2RU units with 2 SM and 2 NIM slots, and two 1RU units with 1 SM and 1 NIM slot. Each chassis comes with 6 embedded Layer3 Ethernet ports (1 Gbps and/or 10 Gbps) as well as a console port and USB port. All other port configurations and capabilities come via Cisco expansion modules, including options for 5G/4G cellular.

The Catalyst C8300 is a big, robust solution that’s designed for medium to large deployments such as campuses, colocation sites, and AI/machine learning data centers. The C8300 is primarily a converged branch networking solution like the ISR 1100 series, but it provides OOB management with optional serial cards.

Cisco 2900 replacement option comparison table

 

Cisco ISR 2900 (EOL)

Cisco ISR 1100

Cisco Catalyst 8300

Nodegrid Net SR

Nodegrid Serial Console Plus

Form Factor

1-2 RU

Desktop-1RU

1-2 RU

1 RU

1 RU

Max IPsec Throughput

Not defined

Up to 18.8 Gbps

Up to 18.8 Gbps

600 Mbps – 1.2 Gbps

600Mbps

Total Onboard WAN or LAN 10/100/1000 Ports

2-3

4-6

4-6

2

2

Total Onboard WAN or LAN 10Gbps Ports

0

0

0-2

2

2

WAN Ports

2-3

0-6

2-6

1+, configurable

0-4

LAN Ports

2-3

0-6

2-6

4-84

0-4

Slots

2-3

0-1

2-4

5

0

Default Memory

512 MB

4 GB

8 GB

8 GB

4 GB

Max Memory

2 GB

8 GB

32 GB

64 GB

16 GB

Compute

UCS-E Card

On-board, Compute card

On-board

OOB Capabilities

Requires Serial Card

Requires Serial Card

Requires Serial Card

Included

Included

Environmental Monitoring

N/A

N/A

N/A

Included

Included

For users looking for a Cisco solution to replace their EOL ISR 2900, the ISR 1100 series and Catalyst C8300 are the closest direct replacements. However, both product lines suffer from a major limitation – they aren’t vendor-neutral.

While Cisco routers integrate with some third-party partners, they do not support custom or third-party applications for automation and orchestration, which limits you to the automation offered by Cisco’s software. This lack of open integrations increases the chances that a Cisco solution won’t be able to hook into all the hardware and software components of a distributed and multi-vendor network architecture.

For example, if you utilize different SD-WAN and next-generation firewall (NGFW) vendors at some of your remote sites, Cisco’s automation may not extend to these devices. That means you’ll need to send out technicians to all remote sites (which could number in the dozens or hundreds) just to set up these services when you otherwise could have deployed them automatically.

Want to learn more about breaking free of locked ecosystems? Read The Benefits of Vendor Agnostic Platforms in Network Management

When network solutions like the Cisco 2900 go EOL, it’s the perfect opportunity to look for alternative options that provide the functionality you need without locking you into an ecosystem or limiting your automation capabilities.

Cisco 2900 direct replacement options from ZPE Systems

ZPE Systems provides a line of vendor-neutral solutions for branch and edge networking called Nodegrid. The Nodegrid Net Services Router (NSR) and Nodegrid Serial Console Plus (NSCP) serve as direct replacements for Cisco 2900 EOL products.

Nodegrid Net Services Router (NSR)

The Nodegrid NSR is a modular branch networking solution that you can customize to increase your terminal server ports, storage space, processing power, or switch ports. The NSR delivers converged branch networking capabilities like SD-WAN, SD-Branch, and NFVs, plus it can host your choice of custom and third-party applications for automation, security, and more.

While the NSR is the perfect converged branch solution to replace the Cisco ISR 2900, it also provides 3rd generation (or Gen 3) OOB management. That means Nodegrid’s OOB network is completely vendor-neutral and can extend automation capabilities to all your legacy and mixed-vendor infrastructure for efficient deployments, management, and orchestration.

Want to see the Nodegrid converged branch networking solution in action? Watch a Demo

Nodegrid Serial Console Plus (NSCP)

The NSCP is a robust, scalable branch networking and out-of-band serial console solution. The NSCP comes in 16-, 32-, 48-, and 96-port models, so you can choose the solution that’s right-sized to your deployment and use case. Plus, you can get built-in 5G/4G LTE and Wi-Fi options for failover and out-of-band.

Like the NSR, the NSCP is also an open platform that can run your choice of software to expand your capabilities and reduce your tech stack. Like the NSR, the NSCP delivers Gen 3 OOB management of all connected infrastructure, enabling true end-to-end automation in data centers, branches, and other remote sites. The NSCP is the perfect replacement for enterprises utilizing the Cisco 2900 for out-of-band management, though it also provides converged branch networking capabilities at any scale.

All Nodegrid devices run the open, Linux-based Nodegrid OS which can host your choice of third-party or custom applications, freeing you from vendor lock-in. You can even integrate infrastructure orchestration tools like Puppet, Chef, and Ansible to extend automation to end devices, regardless of vendor. This is what makes Nodegrid the world’s first Gen 3 branch networking solution.

Want to see how Nodegrid stacks up against Cisco’s replacement options? Click here to download the services routers comparative matrix.

Global support and supply chain

Leaving a trusted ecosystem behind to adopt alternative options can be risky, so it’s important to find a vendor that offers the support you need to make the transition and keep your operations running smoothly. ZPE Systems offers global product support using the “follow the sun” model, which means you get support when you need it, regardless of your timezone. You also won’t have to worry about supply chain issues causing stock shortages – ZPE supplies hyperscalers in 10K+ units per quarter and has great, consistent supply chain control.

Need to replace your Cisco 2900 EOL?

To learn more about replacing your Cisco 2900 EOL solution with the vendor-neutral Nodegrid platform and our shipping in as little as two weeks, contact ZPE Systems today. Contact Us

Cisco 2900 EOL product tables with migration SKUs

Cisco 2900 EOL Model

In Scope Features

Replacement Product (modular form factor)

Cisco ISR 2901

Cisco ISR 2911

Cisco ISR 2921

Cisco ISR 2951

Serial Console Module, Routing, 16 serial ports

ZPE-NSR-816-DAC with 1 x 16 port serial module 1 x ZPE-NSR-16SRL-EXPN

Cisco ISR 2901

Cisco ISR 2911

Cisco ISR 2921

Cisco ISR 2951

Serial Console Module, Routing, 32 serial ports

ZPE-NSR-816-DAC with 2×16 port serial module 2x ZPE-NSR-16SRL-EXPN

Cisco ISR 2901

Cisco ISR 2911

Cisco ISR 2921

Cisco ISR 2951

Serial Console Module, Routing, 48 serial ports

ZPE-NSR-816-DAC with 3×16 port serial module 3x ZPE-NSR-16SRL-EXPN

Cisco ISR 2901

Cisco ISR 2911

Cisco ISR 2921

Cisco ISR 2951

Serial Console Module, Routing, 60 serial ports

ZPE-NSR-816-DAC with 4×16 port serial module 4x ZPE-NSR-16SRL-EXPN

80 serial port option – no Cisco equivalent

Serial Console Module, Routing, 80 serial ports

ZPE-NSR-816-DAC with 5×16 port serial module 5x ZPE-NSR-16SRL-EXPN

 

Cisco 2900 EOL Model

In Scope Features

Replacement Product (fixed form factor)

Cisco ISR 2901

Cisco ISR 2911

Cisco ISR 2921

Cisco ISR 2951

Serial Console Module, Routing, 16 serial ports

ZPE-NSCP-T16R-STND-DAC

Cisco ISR 2901

Cisco ISR 2911

Cisco ISR 2921

Cisco ISR 2951

Serial Console Module, Routing, 32 serial ports

ZPE-NSCP-T32R-STND-DAC

Cisco ISR 2901

Cisco ISR 2911

Cisco ISR 2921

Cisco ISR 2951

Serial Console Module, Routing, 48 serial ports

ZPE-NSCP-T48R-STND-DAC

96 serial port option – no Cisco equivalent

Serial Console Module, Routing, 96 serial ports

ZPE-NSCP-T96R-STND-DAC

Want to see how Nodegrid compares to other serial console solutions?